Lake Home For Sale
Charming Family Cottage on Lake Hartwell - Your Dream Getaway! Discover your perfect retreat in upstate South Carolina with this cozy family-owned cottage on the serene shores of Lake Hartwell. This delightful 2-bedroom, 1-bath home is ideal for those seeking lakefront fun and relaxation. The Main Cottage is Spacious, perfect for family living or weekend getaways. Plus a Tiny House with Additional sleeping quarters for up to 4 guests, ensuring everyone has a comfortable place to rest. There is outdoor decking with ample space for evening entertainment, cookouts, and enjoying the peaceful woodland surroundings. Included is a Covered Slip Dock with convenient lake access for boating, fishing, and water sports. Located in the Foxwood Hills neighborhood: A premier community offering golf, swim, tennis, and playground facilities. Nestled in a picturesque, wooded setting, providing a tranquil escape from the hustle and bustle. Make memories that will last a lifetime in this charming lakeside cottage. Whether you're seeking adventure on the water or a quiet evening under the stars, this Lake Hartwell gem has it all. Contact us today to schedule a viewing and start your next chapter in this beloved family retreat! HOA is 685.00 Annually and there is also a clubhouse with bar and security for the property.Property Details
- Beds: 2
- Baths: 1.0
- Sq Feet: 1024
- Year Built: 1994
- Location: Lake Hartwell
- Acres: 0.270
- Lakefront: Yes
- Lakeview: Yes
- ViewTypes: Lake
- Has Dock? Yes
- Community: Foxwood Hills/Mt Bay Estates
- Heat/AC: Central Furnace, Fireplace
- Siding: Concrete
- Roof: Composition
- Stories: 1
- Fireplaces: Has Fireplace
- Property Taxes: $1,818
- MLS #: 10327222
Location
| Click on map to activate | |
|
|
| (Open in Google Maps) (Bing Map) (Mapquest Map) |
Contact Information:
|
|||
|
|||
Ad Statistics:
| Ad Number : | 5101939 |
| Viewed: | 222 times |
| Added: | Jul 22, 2024 |
| Updated on: | Jul 22, 2024 |
| All information provided is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed and should be independently verified. | |
|
|
|
